Showing posts with label prisonal gist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label prisonal gist. Show all posts

Jonathan Spends N3.53bn annually To Feed Nigerian Prisoners

Leave a Comment
The Nigerian Prisons Service has said it spends about N3.53bn annually on the feeding of inmates across the country.

The Comptroller-General of Prisons, Biodun Ogundipe, told the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Human Rights on Monday that Nigeria had 49,000 prisoners, out of which 38,000 were awaiting trial persons.



Ogundipe had appeared before the committee during the public hearing on the bill to amend the Transfer of Convicted Offenders Act to make it possible for Nigerians serving various jail sentences outside the country could be brought home to complete their sentences.

According to Ogundipe, the nation’s prisons possess the capacity to receive the incoming inmates from abroad, as the congestion of prisons was an urban phenomenon.

He said most of the prisons in the urban centres were far overstretched, while those in the rural areas were receiving inmates far below their capacities.

“We have the capacity to hold convicted prisoners, the problem we have is with the awaiting trial inmates,” he said.

Members of the committee raised questions on the condition of the nation’s prisons, arguing that bringing in additional prisoners from abroad could compound the problems of inmates.

Asked what it takes to feed prisoners, Ogundipe said the service was spending N200 to feed a prisoner on a daily basis.

Although the committee was shocked with disbelief, he explained that the N200 per prisoner per day was a recent improvement on the feeding of inmates, noting that hitherto, the situation was worse.

A bill seeking to give effect to the Commonwealth scheme on convicted offenders was almost killed on the floor of the Senate on Tuesday, but sailed through after a controversial ruling by the President of the Senate, David Mark.

The bill, titled a Bill for an Act to amend the Transfer of Convicted Offenders Act CAP. T19, LFN 2004, seeks to remove from the principal Act the need for the consent of the convicted offender before they could be transferred to a different municipal jurisdiction to serve out their sentences.

The bill is to give effect to the Commonwealth scheme on the convicted offenders between Commonwealth countries and seeks to amend the provisions of the extant Act by removing the consent and verification procedure of returning convicted prisoners to serve out their term in Nigeria.

The amendment is to simply delete Sections 5(1)(d) and 8 which deal with the consent and verification of the convicted offender.

Another controversial clause inserted in the bill is that the administering country, such as Nigeria, will not have the power to review the cases for which the offenders were convicted or grant them pardon without the express permission of the country where they were convicted.

Ogundipe disagreed with that provision, saying that it would not be right for Nigeria to seek the permission of the country of conviction if she finds a good ground to pardon or grant amnesty to the offenders.

He also suggested that the prisoners that should qualify for transfers should have committed offences that were offences in Nigeria.

He said that 561 prisoners in the United Kingdom had been considered qualified for the exchange, just as between 12 and 14 inmates were already screened for the exchange.

Meanwhile, a civil society activist, Mr. Max Banite, who appeared before the committee said the policy was anti people and a breach of the fundamental rights of the people.

He said, “The crimes were committed offshore, the sentences were given offshore, they serve their sentences offshore.”

He argued that the deleting of the clause which allows the prisoners’ consent in the transfer, was also a violation of the rights of the individual.

He argued that Nigeria was a signatory to the Vienna Convention which has as a fundamental principle, the right of consent by prisoners to be transferred.
Read More...

Prisoners Run Riot Over Ban of Porn in Prison

Porn and prison don't quite go hand in hand. At least that's how the Connecticut Department of Correction feels, as they announced a ban on pornography beginning next summer. 

The department announced in July that prisoners had one year to dispose of pornographic materials containing "pictorial depictions of s*xual activity or nudity," giving them enough time for magazine subscriptions to expire. 

However, it seems many inmates disagree with the decision and have begun a letter-writing campaign that urging officials to reconsider the decision. According to the Associated Press, prior to the ban, inmates were allowed pornographic material excluding content that depicted children, bestiality, sadomasochism or the use of force. The AP reports that inmates have sent close to three dozen letters to officials. 

Some letters have offered alternative solutions such as providing "cable programming that offers and displays nudity, also s*xual activity." The initial ban was intended to improve the work conditions for prison guards, especially female members, not forcing them to be exposed to the questionable material on a daily basis. 

According to the Daily News, prison officials also acknowledge that the ban is intended for the prisoners' own good, a point some disagree with (as you can see in the video below). While many of the prisoners writing in are citing their First Amendment rights, it seems unlikely they will have much of a case legally. 

The Newsmen explains that in the past, courts have sided with the prisons. Connecticut however, isn't the only state to ban porn in jail. In July a Michigan man actually sued the state after guards denied his request for pornographic materials, claiming he was subjected to a "poor standard of living" and "s*xual and sensory deprivation."
Read More...